Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are promising biomarkers and mediators of intercellular communication, but their isolation from equine biofluids remains challenging. This study compared two isolation workflows-size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) and differential ultracentrifugation followed by SEC (UCâ+âSEC)-to evaluate their efficiency, reproducibility, and the proteomic composition of EVs derived from equine serum and plasma. Blood from six healthy horses was processed to obtain platelet-free plasma and serum. EVs were isolated using SEC or UCâ+âSEC and characterized by transmission electron microscopy, nanoparticle tracking analysis, and mass spectrometry-based proteomics with functional enrichment analysis. SEC provided higher reproducibility, greater protein yield, and a simpler workflow than UCâ+âSEC. Serum combined with SEC yielded the most consistent proteomic profiles, with strong detection of typical EV markers and the largest overlap among replicates. Vesicles displayed the expected morphology and size distribution, with a predominant population between 100 and 200ânm. Plasma-derived EVs were enriched in proteins related to translation, chaperone activity, and proteasome function, while serum-derived EVs contained proteins involved in immune processes, cytoskeletal organization, adhesion, and hemostasis. Both the isolation method and biological matrix significantly influenced EV yield and proteome composition. SEC applied to serum provided a reproducible and high-quality EV preparation suitable for biomarker discovery. As this was a methodological comparison in healthy animals, diagnostic test performance metrics (sensitivity, specificity, PPV/NPV) were outside the scope of the study; our goal was to quantify upstream analytical determinants (matrix and isolation workflow) that influence reproducibility and discovery-phase proteomic readouts.
Comparative Analysis of Extracellular Vesicle Isolation From Equine Serum and Plasma Using Two Isolation Methods With Structural and Proteomic Validation.
阅读:2
作者:Milczek-Haduch Dominika, Å»migrodzka Magdalena, KieÅbik Paula, Åwiderska Bianka, OlÄdzki Jacek, Witkowska-PiÅaszewicz Olga
| 期刊: | FASEB Journal | 影响因子: | 4.200 |
| 时间: | 2026 | 起止号: | 2026 Jan 31; 40(2):e71472 |
| doi: | 10.1096/fj.202504053R | ||
特别声明
1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。
2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。
3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。
4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。
