Abstract
Thorough quality assessment of novel interactions identified by proteome-wide cross-linking mass spectrometry (XL-MS) studies is critical. Almost all current XL-MS studies have validated cross-links against known three-dimensional structures of representative protein complexes. Here, we provide theoretical and experimental evidence demonstrating that this approach can drastically underestimate error rates for proteome-wide XL-MS datasets, and propose a comprehensive set of four data-quality metrics to address this issue.