Immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 variants after heterologous and homologous ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/BNT162b2 vaccination

异源和同源 ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/BNT162b2 疫苗接种后针对 SARS-CoV-2 变异株的免疫反应

阅读:7
作者:Joana Barros-Martins # ,Swantje I Hammerschmidt # ,Anne Cossmann # ,Ivan Odak ,Metodi V Stankov ,Gema Morillas Ramos ,Alexandra Dopfer-Jablonka ,Annika Heidemann ,Christiane Ritter ,Michaela Friedrichsen ,Christian Schultze-Florey ,Inga Ravens ,Stefanie Willenzon ,Anja Bubke ,Jasmin Ristenpart ,Anika Janssen ,George Ssebyatika ,Günter Bernhardt ,Jan Münch ,Markus Hoffmann ,Stefan Pöhlmann ,Thomas Krey ,Berislav Bošnjak ,Reinhold Förster ,Georg M N Behrens

Abstract

Currently approved viral vector-based and mRNA-based vaccine approaches against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) consider only homologous prime-boost vaccination. After reports of thromboembolic events, several European governments recommended using AstraZeneca's ChAdOx1-nCov-19 (ChAd) only in individuals older than 60 years, leaving millions of already ChAd-primed individuals with the decision to receive either a second shot of ChAd or a heterologous boost with mRNA-based vaccines. However, such combinations have not been tested so far. We used Hannover Medical School's COVID-19 Contact Study cohort of healthcare professionals to monitor ChAd-primed immune responses before and 3 weeks after booster with ChAd (n = 32) or BioNTech/Pfizer's BNT162b2 (n = 55). Although both vaccines boosted prime-induced immunity, BNT162b2 induced significantly higher frequencies of spike-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and, in particular, high titers of neutralizing antibodies against the B.1.1.7, B.1.351 and P.1 variants of concern of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。