Methods
Specimens were manufactured by 3D printing (stereolithography and digital light processing), milling, and autopolymerization. Print specimens were also subjected to different post-curing methods. To assess biocompatibility, a human tongue epithelial cell line was exposed to material-based extracts. Cell viability was measured by MTT assay while Western blot assessed the expression level of selected cytoprotective proteins.
Results
Extracts from the Splint 2.0 material printed with DLP technology and post-cured with the Asiga Flash showed the clearest loss of cell viability. The milled and autopolymerized materials also showed a significant reduction in cell viability. However, by storing the autopolymerized material in dH2O for 12 h, no significant viability loss was observed. Increased levels of cytoprotective proteins were seen in cells exposed to extracts from the print materials and the autopolymerized material. Similarly to the effect on viability loss, storing the autopolymerized material in dH2O for 12 h reduced this effect. Conclusions/clinical relevance: Based on the biocompatibility assessments, clinical outcomes of acrylic-based occlusal device materials may be affected by the choice of manufacturing technique and workflow procedures.