Background
Cell therapy has been proposed as a salvage limb procedure in critical limb ischemia (CLI). In spite of the fact that clinical trials found some efficacy, the mechanism of action remains elusive. The
Discussion
Transcriptomic allows an accurate characterization of CTPs. BM-CTPs have the richest content in terms of stem cells and transcriptome. The high content of mature cells in PB-CTPs means that they work via a paracrine mechanism. The clinical outcome indicates the deleterious influence the patients' status and the limits of an autologous approach. In this respect, MSCs may allow an allogenic strategy.
Methods
Bone marrow (BM-CTPs) (n = 20) and CTPs obtained by non-mobilized cytapheresis (peripheral blood [PB]-CTPs) (n = 20) were compared. CTPs were characterized by their cell composition, by the quantification of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) and mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) and by transcriptomic profiling. The angiogenic profile and the 6-month outcome of CLI patients are described.
Results
Patients presented inflammation syndrome and high levels of CXCL12, soluble stem cell factor and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, whereas granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor was low. Circulating CD34+ cells represented rare events. BM and PB-CTPs were heterogeneous. Mature cells and colony-forming unit-endothelial cells were in higher concentration in PB-CTPs, whereas CD34+ stem cells and EPCs were more abundant in BM-CTPs. MSCs were identified in both CTPs. Transcriptomic profiling revealed the strong angiogenic potential of BM-CTPs. Transcutaneous partial pressure of oxygen, C-reative protein and neutrophil content in CTPs are predictive of the clinical outcome at 6 months.