Cryo-EM structures of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2 spike

SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2 刺突蛋白的冷冻电镜结构

阅读:6
作者:Victoria Stalls ,Jared Lindenberger ,Sophie M-C Gobeil ,Rory Henderson ,Rob Parks ,Maggie Barr ,Margaret Deyton ,Mitchell Martin ,Katarzyna Janowska ,Xiao Huang ,Aaron May ,Micah Speakman ,Esther Beaudoin ,Bryan Kraft ,Xiaozhi Lu ,Robert J Edwards ,Amanda Eaton ,David C Montefiori ,Wilton B Williams ,Kevin O Saunders ,Kevin Wiehe ,Barton F Haynes ,Priyamvada Acharya

Abstract

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron BA.2 sub-lineage has gained in proportion relative to BA.1. Because spike (S) protein variations may underlie differences in their pathobiology, here we determine cryoelectron microscopy (cryo-EM) structures of the BA.2 S ectodomain and compare these with previously determined BA.1 S structures. BA.2 receptor-binding domain (RBD) mutations induce remodeling of the RBD structure, resulting in tighter packing and improved thermostability. Interprotomer RBD interactions are enhanced in the closed (or 3-RBD-down) BA.2 S, while the fusion peptide is less accessible to antibodies than in BA.1. Binding and pseudovirus neutralization assays reveal extensive immune evasion while defining epitopes of two outer RBD face-binding antibodies, DH1044 and DH1193, that neutralize both BA.1 and BA.2. Taken together, our results indicate that stabilization of the closed state through interprotomer RBD-RBD packing is a hallmark of the Omicron variant and show differences in key functional regions in the BA.1 and BA.2 S proteins. Keywords: CP: Microbiology; Omicron BA.2; SARS-CoV-2 spike; cryoelectron microscopy; fusion peptide; immune evasion; receptor binding domain.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。