Discussion
Our results support FSHD pathomechanism being complex with a multigenic contribution by several known (SMCHD1, DNMT3B, LRIF1) and possibly other candidate genes (CTCF, DNMT1, DNMT3A, EZH2, SUV39H1) to disease penetrance and expressivity. Our results further emphasize the importance of extending the analysis of molecular findings within the proband's family, with the purpose of providing a broader framework for understanding single cases and allowing finer genotype-phenotype correlations in FSHD-affected families.
Methods
A cohort of 126 patients with clinical signs of FSHD were included in the study, which were characterized by D4Z4 sizing, methylation analysis and WES. Specific protocols were employed for D4Z4 sizing and methylation analysis, whereas the Illumina® Next-Seq 550 system was utilized for WES. The study included both patients with a DRA compatible with FSHD diagnosis and patients with longer D4Z4 alleles. In case of patients harboring relevant variants from WES, the molecular analysis was extended to the family members.
Results
The WES data analysis highlighted 20 relevant variants, among which 14 were located in known genetic modifiers (SMCHD1, DNMT3B and LRIF1) and 6 in candidate genes (CTCF, DNMT1, DNMT3A, EZH2 and SUV39H1). Most of them were found together with a permissive short (4-7 RU) or borderline/long DRA (8-20 RU), supporting the possibility that different genes can contribute to disease heterogeneity in presence of a FSHD permissive background. The segregation and methylation analysis among family members, together with clinical findings, provided a more comprehensive picture of patients.